GR Semicolon EN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Kyrylchuk, Iryna
en
dc.date.accessioned
2016-02-04T07:09:29Z
dc.date.available
2016-02-05T01:00:15Z
dc.date.issued
2016-02-04
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/12427
dc.rights
Default License
dc.subject
non-signatories, arbitration, concept of dispute
en
dc.title
Per aspera ad astra - non-signatories in arbitration: from "juristic chemistry" to concept of dispute
en
heal.type
masterThesis
el
heal.creatorID.email
kirilchukirina@gmail.com
heal.generalDescription
This dissertation is written as part of the LLM in Transnational and European Commer-cial Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution at the International Hellenic University. It is a modest contribution to the ongoing discussion on the issue of necessity to reconsider the settled contractual approach of consent to arbitrate as regards non-signatories to-wards the concept of dispute.
en
heal.classification
Law, Arbitration
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Arbitration (International law)
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Dispute resolution (Law)
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Dissertations, Academic
heal.contributorName
Prof.Gottwald, Peter
en
heal.language
en
el
heal.access
free
el
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
el
heal.references
Brekoulakis S., Third parties in International commercial arbitration (1st edn. Oxford University Press, 2010) Brekoulakis S., Parties in international arbitration: consent v commercial reality, con-ference 30th anniversary of the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary, University of London, 19-21 April 2015
el
heal.fileFormat
pdf
el
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Mediation, Arbitration and Energy Law
el
heal.publicationDate
2016-01-08
heal.bibliographicCitation
Case law Precision Instrument Mfg. Co. v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery, 324 U.S. 806, 814, 65 S. Ct. 993, 89 L. Ed. 1381 (1945), available at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/324/806/case.html United Steelworkers of Am. v. Warrior&Gulf N.Co.,363 U.S. 574,582-83 (1960), available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/363/574 ICC Case No 2138 of 1974, (1975) JDI (Clunet) ICC award no. 1434 of 1975, (1976) JDI (Clunet) Sam Reisfeld & Son Import Company v. S.A. Eteco, 530 F.2d 679, 681 (5th Cir.1976) Dow chemical group v. Isover- Saint- Gobain, Interim Award of September 23, (1982) in No. 4131, available at: http://www.trans-lex.org/204131#head_2 ICC Case No. 3879, Interim award of 5 March (1984), Yearbook XI (1986) p. 127 at p. 132. McBroPlanning &Dev co v Triangle Elec.Constr.Co., 741 F. 2d 342, (1984) Westland Helicopters v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, The Arab Organization for In-dustrialization and others, Tribunal Fédéral [Supreme Court], 19 July 1988 Paris Cour d'appel, Nov. 30.1988, Korsnas Marna v Durand-Auzias. (1989) REV. ARB. p. 691, with note Tschanz 208 ICC case 5730 of 1988, (1990) 117 JDI (Clunet) p. 1029; (1992) Rev. Arb, p. 25 with note Cohen. ICC award no. 5721 of 1990, (1990) 117 JDJ (Clunet) 1029 ICC case 6519 (1991) Republic of Nicaragua, 937 F.2d at 478, (1991) available at http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/937/469/192868/ Transrol Navegacao S.A.782 F.Supp.848 (S.D.N.Y.1991) Deloitte Noraudit v. Deloitte Haskins&Sells No. 165, Docket 93-7271. Available at: http://www.leagle.com/decision/199310699F3d1060_1895/DELOITTE%20NORAUDIT%20v.%20DELOITTE%20HASKINS%20&%20SELLS Sunkist Soft Drinks v Sunkist Growers 91-9153, (1993) "Jaguar" case Paris Cour d'Appel, 7 Dec. (1994), V 2000 V Project XJ 220 ITD et autre, (1996) Rev Arb. p.67 Polish Supreme Court, 3 September (1998), I CKN 822/97, available at: http://arbitration-poland.com/case-law/475,polish_supreme_court_judgment_dated_3_september_192_97.html ICC case 9517 ,30 November (1998) International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen Gmbh, 206 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 2000), available at: http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/206/411/597981/ Cass. 1st Civil Chamber, 28 May (2002), CIMAT v SCA Motorola Credit Corporation v. Uzan, 322 F.3d 130, 134 (2d Cir. 2003), available at: http:// law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/274/481/2493622/ C&M Farming Ltd v Peterson Farms Inc.(2004) Sahrank v Oracle Corporation, Docket No. 02-9383, (2005), Available at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1476967.html 2' U. S. D. Court Texas, (2006) - WL 3513)633 Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan, 447 F.3d 411, 416 (5th Cir. 2006), Available at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1089023.html ABS case, 2007, Bulletin 2007 I.129 Sourcing Unlimited, Inc. v. Asimco, Inc.,526 F.3d 38,48 1st Cir. ( 2008) Gorlach v. Sports Club Co., 148 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71 (2009) Cass. 1st Civil Chamber, Refcomp v Axa (2010) Paris, Government of Pakistan v Dallah (2011) Paris, Kosa v Rhodia (2011) Papillon Group v Syrian Arab Republic (2011) Lindemann v. Hume, 204 Cal. App. 4th 556 (2012) Cass. n° 12-12953, SARL Lola fleurs v Société Monceau fleurs et autres (2013) Belzberg v Verus Invs Holdings Inc, 21 NY 3d 626 (2013) In re Lloyd's Register North America, Inc. No. 14-20554, 2015 WL 791405 (5th Cir. Feb. 24, (2015) Books/Articles/ Reports/Working papers Alvarez, H., Chapter 6: Autonomy of International Arbitration Process in Julian D. M. Lew and Loukas A. Mistelis (eds), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library, Volume 15 Kluwer Law International 2006, pp. 119 - 139 Anenson, T. Leigh, From Theory to Practice: Analyzing Equitable Estoppel Under a Pluralistic Model of Law. Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1013103 Blessing M., The Arbitration agreement- Its multifold Critical Aspects, A.S.A. Special Series N8, 19 (December 1994) Bonell M.J., An international restatement of contract law: The UNIDROIT principles of international commercial contracts 142 (3d Ed., 2005), Born G.,“Dallah and the New York Convention”, April 7, 2011, Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2011/04/07/dallah-and-the-new-york-convention/ Brekoulakis S., Third parties in International commercial arbitration (1st edn. Oxford University Press, 2010) Brekoulakis S., Parties in international arbitration: consent v commercial reality, con-ference 30th anniversary of the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary, University of London, 19-21 April 2015, available at: http://globalarbitrationreview.com/news/article/33775/queen-mary-professor-challenges-thinking-consent/ Burger, E., Warren Hon.,C.J. of the US Sup. Ct., Need of systematic anticipation, Addresses delivered at the national conference on the causes of popular dissatisfac-tion with the administration of Justice (Apr.7, 1976, in 70 Fed. Rules Decisions 79,92-94 (1976) Capper Ph., Arbitration: just what are the parties agreeing to? The Worshipful company of arbitrators, the master's lecture 2009. Available at: http://www.arbitratorscompany.org/speechesAnnualLecture.php Carbonneau T., Jaeggi J., AAA, Handbook on commercial arbitration, Juris Net; 2 edition, (September 30, 2010), 500, at 43. Carrol, Alice in Wonderland Crivellaro J., Conflicting contrasts in Dallah v government of Pakistan, 17 Colum. J. Eur. L. F. 51 (2011), available at :http://www.cjel.net/online/17_2-crivellaro/#ftn1 Diallo O.,, Le consentement des parties à l’arbitrage international, (PUF 2010) DeArman j., Comment, Resolving Arbitration's Nonsignatory Issue:  A Critical Analy-sis of the Application of Equitable Estoppel in Alabama Courts, 29 Cumb. L. Rev. 645 (1998-1999) Fouchard, Gaillard& Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration par1443 et seq (Gaillard&Savage Eds.,1999) Goldhaber M.D., Wanted: a world investment court, The American Lawyer: focus Europe, summer 2004. Gravel S. , Peterson P., French law and arbitration clauses-Distinguishing scope from validity: comment on ICC Case n 6519 Final award,(1992)37 McGill L.J. 510 Habegger Ph., Extension of arbitration agreements to nonsignatories and require-ments of form, ASA Bulletin, Vol. 22 (2) 2004, 398 at 404. Hanotiau B., 'Problems Raised by Complex Arbitrations Involving Multiple Contracts—Parties—Issues An Analysis' (2001) 18 Journal of International Arbitration, Issue 3, pp. 251–360 Hanotiau B.,Complex Arbitrations: Multiparty, Multicontract, Multi-Issue and Class Actions, Kluwer Law International, 2005 - Law - 392 pages, at 50 Hanotiau B., Chapter 14: Groups of Companies in International Arbitration in Julian D. M. Lew and Loukas A. Mistelis (eds), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library, Volume 15 Kluwer Law International 2006, pp. 279 - 290 Hanotiau B.,Non-signatories in international arbitration: lessons from thirty years of case law in ICCA Congress Series, n°13, 2007, 341. Hanotiau B., Consent to Arbitration: do we share a common vision?, Arbitration In-ternational, 2011, p. 539 Hanotiau B., "The Issue of Non-Signatory States", 23 The American Review of Inter-national Arbitration (2012 Nos. 3-4) Horacio A. GRIGERA NAON, Ed., Committee on International Commercial Arbitra-tion, Complex Arbitrations (Multi-Issue, Multi-Party, Multi-Contract): First Interim Re-port of the Sixty-Sixth Conference of the International Law Association, Buenos Aires Conference 1994, (ILA, London 1994) footnote 1, p. 690. Hawkins, Theodore J. (2012) "Arbitration, Equitable Estoppel, and the Right to Inter-locutory Appellate Review," St. John's Law Review: Vol. 84: No. 5, Article 1. Available at: http:// scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol84/iss5/1 Hosking, James M., The Third Party Non-Signatory's Ability to Compel International Commercial Arbitration: Doing Justice without Destroying Consent, 4 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. Iss. 3 (2004). Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol4/iss3/6 Joining non-signatories to an arbitration, Practical Law Article 6-275-4952 (2014).Available at: http://www.stornellocorrerolaw.com/documents/Joining-non-signatories-to-an-arbitration.pdf Kaufmann-Kohler, ‘Interpretation of Treaties: How do arbitral tribunal interpret dispute settlement provisions embodied in investment treaties?’, in LA Mistelis and JDM Lew (eds), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2005) para 13-13. Lew J., Mistelis l., and S.Kroell, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International 2003) at para 6-7 et seq Martinez-Fraga, PedroJ.,"The American Influences on International Commercial Arbi-tration", Cambridge University Press, 2009 at 158 Martinez, A., A tale of two judicatures, Int’l Arbitration Law Rev. N4 (2011); Melanie Willems & Markus Esly, Dallah v Pakistan – French Courts Uphold the Award, 5 The Arbiter 3, 6 (2011). Mayer, Pierre. "The Extension of the Arbitration Clause to Non-Signatories - The Ir-reconcilable Positions of French and English Courts." American University Interna-tional Law Review 27 no. 4 (2012): 831-836. Meyniel, Alexandre. "That Which Must Not Be Named: Rationalizing the Denial of U.S. Courts With Respect to the Group of Companies Doctrine." The Arbitration Brief 3, no. 1 (2013): 18-55. Mistelis LA, ‘Reality Test: Current State of Affairs in Theory and Practice Relating to “Lex Arbitri” ’, (2006) 17(2) The American Review of International Arbitration 159. Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws “ Oppetit Bruno, Theorie de l'Arbitrage, pp. 125-126. Park William, Non-signatories and International Contracts: An Arbitrator’s Dilemma, in Multiple Party Actions in International Arbitration 3 (2009); adapted from Non-Signatories and International Arbitration, Leading Arbitrators' Guide to International Arbitration 553 (L. Newman & R. Hill, 2nd Ed. 2008). Available at: http: / www.williamwpark.com/publications.htm Pavic, Vladimir, 'Non-Signatories' and the Long Arm of Arbitral Jurisdiction (2009). RESOLVING INTERNATIONAL CONFLICTS - LIBER AMICORUM TIBOR VARADY, P. Hay, L. Vekas, Y. Elkana, N. Dimitrijevic, Eds., CEU Press, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1421201 PLATTE M., “An Arbitrator's Duty to Render Enforceable Awards”, 20 Journal of In-ternational Arbitration (2003, no. 3) p. 307 at p. 308 Pound R.,Social Control Through Law (Transaction Publishers, 1996) p. 46 et seq. Rubins Noah, “Group of Companies Doctrine and the New York Convention” in Em-manuel GAILLARD and Domenico DI PIETRO, Eds., Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2008) at p. 460. Sandrock Otto, Arbitration Agreements and Groups of Companies, in: Festschrift Pierre Lalive, Basel, Frankfurt a.M. 1993, at 625 et seq. http://www.trans-lex.org/116200/ Smit, H.,When is a Government bound by a contract, including an arbitration clause, it did not sign?,16 AM. Rev. Intl ARB.323 (2005) Steingruber Andrea M., The Mutable and Evolving Concept of ‘Consent’ in Interna-tional Arbitration - Comparing rules, laws, treaties and types of arbitration for a better understanding of the concept of ‘Consent’ (2012) Oxford U Comparative L Forum 2 at ouclf.iuscomp.org Tang, E., Methods to extend the scope of an arbitration agreement to third party non-signatories, W4635 research paper (2009). Theory of judicial Decision, 36 HARV.L.REV.641, 657 (1923) Thomas, Aubrey Laine, Nonsignatories in Arbitration: A Good-Faith Analysis (June 24, 2010). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 953, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1629830 Trachtman J.P., The future of international law, Cambridge 2013 Tweeddale, A, Tweeddale K.,Arbitration of commercial disputes, International and English Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, 2007 at 6.38 Young, Roger &Spitz Stephen, SUEM-Spitzs Ultimate Equitable Maxim: In Equity, Good guys should win and bad guys should lose, 55S.C.L.Rev.175,177 (2003) Youssef K., “The Group of Companies Doctrine in Egyptian Law”, 3 SIAR (2007) pp. 103-113, (Case no. 4729, 2004) Youssef K.,"The Limits of Consent" The Right or Obligation to Arbitrate of Non-Signatories in Group of Companies, in B. Hanotiau and E. Schwartz (Eds.), Multiparty Arbitration, Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law, No.7, 2010, pp. 71-109 Youssef, K., Consent in context: Fulfilling the promise of international arbitration, Multiparty, Multi-Contract, and Non-Contract Arbitration, (Thomson Reuters 2011); AM Steingruber, Consent in international arbitration, (OUP 2012). Youssef K.., The Present – Commercial Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice: Universal Arbitration Between Freedom and Constraint: The Challenges of Jurisdiction in Multiparty, Multi-Contract Arbitration in Albert Jan van den Berg (Ed), Arbitration: The Next Fifty Years, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 16, Kluwer Law International 2012 pp. 103 – 132 Wahab Mohamed S.Abdel, "Extension of arbitration agreement to third parties: A never ending legal quest through the spatial-temporal continuum," in Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration 137 (F. Ferrari & S. Kroll Eds., Sellier International Pub-lishers, 2010) Williams E. Dwayne, Binding Non-signatories to arbitration Agreements, 25 FRAN-CHISE L.J. (2006) at 176 Zuberbuhler T., Non-signatories and consensus to arbitrate, 26 ASA BULLETIN 1 /2008 (Mars) Zuberbuhler T., Signatory or not? Groups, Affiliates and MBOs, case note on Swiss Supreme Court Decision of 22 January 2008, 4A_244/2007,26 ASA BULLETIN 3/2008 (Septembre) Web-cites California lawyer (2015), http://www.callawyer.com Commercial dispute resolution (2015) http://www.cdr-news.com/4980-a-tale-of-two-cities GAR (2015), http://globalarbitrationreview.com International Arbitration Attorney Network, (2015) https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/ Italaw (2015) http://www.italaw.com/cases JUSTIA US Law (2015) http://law.justia.com Kluwer arbitration (2015) http://www.kluwerarbitration.com New York Convention (2015) http://www.newyorkconvention.org/ NYU LAW, transnational notes (2015) http://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/transnational
en
heal.abstract
This dissertation was written as part of the LLM in Transnational and European Commercial law and Alternative Dispute Resolution at the International Hellenic University. For decades, academics and practitioners unsuccessfully try to unravel the mysterious password to the non-signatories issue in arbitration. To the date, the only solution so far proposed by current practice is a traditional concept of consent based on the application of contractual theories and general principles. However, the current commercial reality develops new sophisticated business forms that cannot be covered by such an elementary approach resulting in a chaotic decision-making (the so-called “legal creativism”) based on efficiency and fairness to the detriment of consent in the sense of its replacement. Does this mean that a traditional concept of consent to arbitrate has been modified un-der the influence of the arbitration transforming process? Is it really necessary (im-portant) to sign an arbitration agreement at all? Does this mean that accepted contrac-tual theories are pure legal fictions based on none of consent at all? If so, could a ju-risdictional consideration based on a concept of dispute be an alternative solution to the problem? This work attempts to analyze the aforesaid trends and determine whether the “out of the box” thinking could be a practical remedy to the problem in the era of cosmopolitan arbitration? I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor Profes-sor Peter Gottwald for his significant contribution to my thesis with his invaluable sup-port and advices that led me to the right way. On a more personal level, I want to express my gratitude to my family for their uncondi-tional support and love as well as a constant inspiration during my studies in Greece.
en
heal.tableOfContents
ABSTRACT III PREFACE I CONTENTS III INTRODUCTION 1 A. BACK TO BASICS 1 B. “CREATIVE LEGALISM” 3 C. “AT THE CROSSWAY OF THE ROADS” 4 D. PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF THIS THESIS 5 I. CONSENT: STILL DISUNITY OF ESSENCE 6 A. ACADEMIC BATTLES: DURABLE PAST V. PROMISING FUTURE 6 B. “JURISTIC MAGIC”: IN QUEST FOR CONSENT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN EQUITY AND CONDUCT 7 C. NOTION OF TRANSFORMATION: FROM “ECO ZONE” TO “BIOME” 8 Jurisdictional arsenal: règle de raison 9 II. CONTRACTUAL THEORIES AND CONSENT: CHAMELEON EFFECT 12 A. GOOD FAITH 13 Estoppel 14 B. DECODING THE CODE OF CONDUCT 22 French “nightmare”- Group of companies' doctrine 24 III. IN THE QUEST FOR A SOLUTION: FROM CONTRACTUAL “DUE PROCESS PARANOIA” TO CONCEPT OF DISPUTE 34 A. GENERAL SOLUTIONS - AT FIRST GLANCE 35 B. A HYBRID APPROACH 36 C. CONCEPT OF DISPUTE 38 IV. CONCLUSIONS 43 BIBLIOGRAPHY 48 CASE LAW 48 BOOKS/ARTICLES/ REPORTS/WORKING PAPERS 51 WEB-CITES 56
en
heal.advisorName
Gottwald, Peter
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Prof.Dr. Athanassios Kaissis, Dr. Komninos Komnios
en
heal.academicPublisher
International Hellenic University
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
el
heal.numberOfPages
63
el


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Related Items