Dania, Nikoletta

2016-02-26T01:00:15Z

https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/12451

THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THE REGULATION NR 1896/2006 REGARDING THE EUROPEAN PAYMENT ORDER: LEGAL MATTERS AND JUDICIAL PRACTICE

1104140010

Money orders--European Union countries

Procedure (Law)

Procedure (Law)--Greece

Payment--Law and legislation

Law--European Economic Community countries

Payment--European Economic Community countries

free

1) Anthimos, Study, “SPECIAL MATTE R ”, STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION AND CONTINUANCE OF THE PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 16 - 17 OF THE REGULATION 1896/2006 (EU ROPEAN PAYMENT ORDER), ARMENOPOULOS 2014/2001 2) Carratta A., Il procedimento ingiutivo europeo e la “comunitarizzazione” del diritto processuale civile, R.D.P.2007. 1519 3) E - codex, Online European Payment Orders in Europe, General information, Making justice faster.eu 4) Fradeani R., I pressuposti per la concessione dell’ ingiunzione di pagamento europea, in Verso II prodedimento ingiutivo europeo, Milano 2007 5) Gesetz zur Verbesserung der grenzuberschreitenden Forderungsdurchsetzung und Zustellung, BGBI 2008, Teil I, Nr 50, 2122. 6) Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure and on measures to simplify and speed up small claims litigation, COM/2002/0746 final* 7) Guinchard E., Commentare sur la proposition de reglement instituant une injonction de payer europe enne , Pet.Aff. 2006 8) https://e - justice.europa.eu/content_court_fees_epo - 305 - en.do 9) Judgment of the Court of 4 - 9 - 2014, C - 120/13,Eco cosmetics GmbH& CO KG - vs - Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C - 119/13) and Raifferisenbank St.Georgen reg.Gen.mbH - vs Tetyana Boncyk 10) Judgment of the European Court of Justice 0144/2012, issued on 13 - 6 - 2013, Goldbet Sportweten GmbH - vs - Massimo Sperindeo 11) Judgment of the European Court of Justice 0215/2011, issue d on 13 - 12 - 2012, Iwona Szyrocka - vs - Siger Technologie GmbH 12) Judgment of the European Court of Justice 0324/2012, issued on 21 - 3 - 2013, Novontech - Zala Kft – vs - Logicdata Electronic & Software Enticklungs GmbH 13) Judgment 3278/2012 of the Multimember Court of Th essaloniki, published in NOMOS, ARMENOPOULOS 2014/102 14) Judgment nr 3365/2012 of the First Instance of the Court of Piraeus issued on 6 - 7 - 2012, NOMOS 15) J udgment 11143/2014 of the Fist Instance Court of Thessaloniki, , published in NOMOS, ARMENOPOULOS 2014/189 5 16) KAČEVSKA INGA, RUDEVSKA BAIBA, Practical Application of European Union Regulations Relating to European Union Level Procedure in Civil Cases: the Experience in Baltic States, http://www.just.ee./sites/www.just.ee/files/euroopa_liidu tasandil_tsivilkohtumenetlust_reguleerivate_maar uste_rakenduspraktika.balti_r iikide_kogemus_kogu_uuring_inglise keeles.pdf 17) Karameros St., , “The Regulation 1896/2006 for the down of the European order for payment”, Greek Justice, 2008.351 18) Kramer, Enhancing Enforcement in the European Union. The European Order for Payment Procedure and its implementation in the Member States, Particularly in Germany, the Netherlands, and England, Ch. Van Rhee and A. Uzelac (eds), Enforcement and Enforceability. Tradition and Reform (2010) - 38 - 19) Ley 4/2011, de 24 de Marzo, de modificacion de la Ley 1/2000 , de 7 de enero, de Enjuidiciamento Civil, para facilitar la aplicacion en Espana de los processos europeos monitorio y de escada cuantia, BOE 2011, I - 5392 20) Ontanu Elena Alina and Pannebakker Ekaterina, Tackling Language Obstacles in Cross - border litigation : The European Order for Payment and the European Small Claims Procedure Approach, www.erasmuslawreview.nl Erasmus Law Review, Volume 5, Issue 3 (2012) 21) Pantazopoulos, “European Payment Order - Interpretation per a rticle - The Regulation 1896/2006 as applied in Greece”, Sakkoula SA Publications, 2012 22) Papastamou Chr., The European order for payment as a tool for the contemporary lawyer regarding the handling of cross - border civil disputes, NoB 2011.503 23) Pernfuss A., D ie Effizienz des Europaischen Mahnverfarhrens, Baden - Baden 2009 24) Podimata E., European Payment Order According to the Regulation (EC) 1896/2006 , Publications Sakkoula SA, 2011 25) Practice Guide for the application of the Regulation on the European Order for p ayment, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/civil/ 26) Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure, COM (2013) 794 final 27) REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the application of Regulation (EC) 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Creating a European Order for Payment Procedure , COM (2015) 495, Brussels 13.10.2015 28) Romano A., Il procedimento europeo di ingiunzione di pagamento, Regolamento (CE) N1896/2006 del 2 dicembre 2006, Milano 2009 29) Silvestri, Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU, https://www.academia.edu/2511267/Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU European Order for Payment Procedure and European Small Claims Procedure Italian Report 30) Stone Peter, EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, Published by Edward El gor Publishing Limited, 2014 31) Sujecki Bartosz, Das Europaische Mahnverfahren in NJW 23,2008 32) Schweighofer Eva, European Order for Payment Application, https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/134513

2016-02-25

Contents ABSTRACT ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... III PREFACE ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ I CONTENT S ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... III INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 1 CHAPTER 1: PRACTICAL SIGNIFICAN CE OF THE REGULATION ................... 3 UNIFICATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS ................................ ................................ .......... 3 PROVISION OF LOW COST, FAST AND EFFECTIVE LEGAL PROTECTION ....................... 4 PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECT - FACILITATE CROSS - BORDER TRANSACTIONS ..................... 6 CHAPTER 2: APPLICATION OF TH E REGULATION ................................ ............................ 7 STATISTICAL DATA ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 7 CONDITIONS FOR APPLI CATION AND FOLLOWED PRACTICE ................................ ......................... 8 APPLICATION IN GREEC E ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 13 Comparison of the European Payment order regime with the national payment order procedure ................................ ................................ ................ 14 How the Regulation 1896/2006 has been applied in Greece so far ................ 19 CHAPTER 3: MATTERS OF ENFORC EMENT ................................ ................................ .... 23 CHAPTER 4: CASE - LAW ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 27 CONCLUSIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 3 35 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 34

KAISSIS, ATHANASIOS PROF.DR

KOMNIOS, KOMNINOS DR.

ihu