GR Semicolon EN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Perimeni, Kyriaki
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-05-04T07:22:11Z
en
dc.date.available
2017-05-09T00:00:27Z
dc.date.issued
2017-05-04
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/15284
en
dc.rights
Default License
en
dc.title
Implementing the Consumer ADR Directive 2013/11/EU in United Kingdom and Greece
en
heal.type
masterThesis
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Dispute resolution (Law)--England
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Dispute resolution (Law)--Greece
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Consumer protection--Law and legislation--England
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Consumer protection--Law and legislation--Greece
en
heal.language
en
en
heal.access
free
en_US
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
en
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Mediation, Arbitration and Energy Law
en
heal.publicationDate
2017-05-02
en
heal.abstract
This dissertation was written as part of the LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Mediation, Arbitration and Energy Law at the International Hellenic University. The dissertation will outline the background and key features of ADR Directive and ODR Regulation with respect to it s national implementation in Greece and United Kingdom . As consumers and traders were not fully aware of the existing out - of court redress mechanisms, the Council of European Union agreed that consumer ADR schemes can offer low - cost, simple and quick redress for both consumers and traders. For this reason ADR Directive and its successful implementation was necessary in order to strengthen consumers’ confidence in the internal market, including the area of online commerce, by ensuring access to simple, efficient, fast and low - cost ways of resolving domestic and cross - border disputes which arise from sales or service contracts. A comparative study on different regulatory frameworks of Greece and United Kingdom will be attempted providing substantial analysis of the law and practice in relation to implementation of the Directive as well as analyze the possibilities provided by the ADR Directive and the way by which the above Member States exploited or not exploited these possibilities. The aim of this dissertation is to provide an in depth evaluation of English and Greek legislation towards the compliance with the specified standards set out in EU Directive (2013/11/EU) on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes. An article by article analysis of the legislation from the beginning to the end will be used to identify key constructive points for consideration in understanding the level of harmonization with the Directive and the future possible adoption of new legal provisions on procedures for the out - of - court resolution of disputes between consumers and traders. Briefly, this study aims to meet the need of a proper and adequate implementation by UK and Greece, through the following specific research objectives: a) Comparative legal analysis of current national implementation of the ADR Directive by United Kingdom and Greece. And b) Comprehensive legal analysis of the possible attempts that would have to be made by UK and Greece to increase uniformity, in order to achieve the maximum benefits of the ADR Directive.
en
heal.advisorName
Komnios, Komninos
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Komnios, Komninos
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Kaissis, Athanasios
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Papadopoulos, Thomas
en
heal.academicPublisher
IHU
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
en
heal.numberOfPages
93
en
heal.spatialCoverage
United Kingdom
en
heal.spatialCoverage
Greece
en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Related Items