dc.contributor.author
Zachariadou, Dimitra
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-05-10T10:25:15Z
dc.date.available
2017-05-11T00:00:32Z
dc.date.issued
2017-05-10
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/15808
dc.rights
Default License
dc.subject
Judicial Mediation
en
dc.title
Recent legal aspects of judicial mediation: a Case Study with special references to Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki
en
heal.type
masterThesis
en_US
heal.generalDescription
The present dissertation has three principal parts. The first one is an overview of the legislative environment of judicial mediation in the European Union and in Greece according to the provisions of the Greek Procedural Civil Code, with emphasis to the process of judicial mediation in Thessaloniki’s Court of First Instance. Then we examine how a judge can act as a mediator and the significant differences between Mediation and Judicial Mediation. The second part contains the unfolding mediation process and how it responds to the cases that were presented to the Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki. Finally, in the third part we conclude by suggesting some continuing challenges, together with an annex of a form of minutes of judicial mediation as lodged to the secretary of the Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki.
en
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Mediation--Greece
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Conflict of laws--Commercial law--Greece
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Civil procedure--Greece
heal.keywordURI.LCSH
Arbitration and award--Greece
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
en_US
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, Executive MBA
en_US
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, MSc in Management
en_US
heal.publicationDate
2017-01-24
heal.bibliographicCitation
Dimitra Zachariadou RECENT LEGAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MEDIATION
A Case Study with special references to Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki
LLM International Hellenic University 2017
en
heal.abstract
This dissertation was written as part of the LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Mediation, Arbitration and Energy Law at the International Hellenic University, aiming to provide a comprehensive and thorough review of the essentials of the Judicial Mediation in Greece.
It is undisputable that conflict lies at the heart of the democratic process. The most innovative decisions are engendered by productive dialogue that explores different proposals and views with main aim the creative solutions. That is why it is more than challenging to transformation of the conflict from a destructive and adversarial battling to a creative solution of a problem.
In the framework of ensuring a balanced relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings, the European Parliament adopted Directive 2008/52/EC on May 21, 2008 under its EU target for obtaining alternative ways of resolving civil and commercial disputes. Greek legislation was not unfamiliar with ways of resolving the dispute out of court or by means of lawsuits. Mediation was established in Greece by the Greek Mediation Act 3898/2010 (hereafter GrMA) as an alternative way of resolving private disputes.
The GrMA 3898/2010 did not provide for judicial mediation. Though the issue of genuine judicial mediation was the topic of discussion and concern for the Committee set up for the reform of the Greek Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter CCP) as well as the Committee that worked on the incorporation of the European Directive in Greece, the interference of judges in mediation as mediators themselves was not initially accepted, because of the fear of excluding the judges in subsequent proceeding. For that reason the Greek Mediation Act did not provide for judicial mediation.
However, article 7 of L. 4055/2012 introduced a new institution of extrajudicial settlement of private disputes, the judicial mediation, and finally Article 214B was added to CCP. This new way of solving differences is not growing "competitively" but parallel to the other alternatives. This parallel institutionalization of judicial mediation enabled citizens to achieve- without recourse to judicial proceedings- an effective resolution of their differences.
en
heal.tableOfContents
Contents
Abstract
Preface
Introduction
PART I
1. The legislative environment of judicial mediation
1.1. The European conjuncture
1.2. Declarations of the Council of Europe
1.3. The Greek legal framework: The provisions of the Article 214 B of the Greek Civil Procedure Code (GrCCP)
1.4. The constitutional and international legal foundations for the institutionalization of judicial mediation in Greece.
2. The Judicial Mediation Procedure in Greece
2.1. The Conflict.
2.2. The prospect of compromise through consent
2.3. The negotiation process
2.4. The Settlement
3. The process of Judicial Mediation in Thessaloniki’s Court of First Instance
3.1. The procedure
3.2. The enforceability of agreements resulting from judicial mediation
4. Can a judge really act as a mediator?
5. Significant differences between Mediation and Judicial Mediation
PART II
6. Commenced Judicial Mediation Proceedings in the Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki
6. 1. The First Case
6.2. The Second Case
6.3. The Third Case
6.4. The Fourth Case
6.5. The Fifth Case
6.6. The Sixth Case
6.7. The Seventh Case.
6.8. The eighth case
6.9. The ninth case.
6.10. The tenth case
6.11. The eleventh case
6.12. The twelfth case
6.13. The thirteenth case
6.14. The fourteenth case
6.15. The fifteenth case
6.16. The sixteenth case
6.17. The seventeenth case.
6.18. The eighteenth case
PART III
7. Concluding Remarks
8. Annex
9. Contents
10. Bibliography
en
heal.advisorName
Komnios, Komninos
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Komnios, Komninos
en
heal.academicPublisher
IHU
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
en_US
heal.numberOfPages
48
en_US
heal.spatialCoverage
Greece
en