GR Semicolon EN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Akritidou, Anthi
en
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-03T13:30:15Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-04T00:00:31Z
dc.date.issued
2020-06-03
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/29486
dc.rights
Default License
dc.subject
Publishers
en
dc.subject
Related right
en
dc.subject
DSM directive
en
dc.subject
Article 15
en
dc.title
The New Related Right for Publishers according to the EU DSM Directive
en
heal.type
masterThesis
en_US
heal.language
en
en_US
heal.access
free
en_US
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
en_US
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, MA in Art, Law and Economy
en_US
heal.publicationDate
2020-01
heal.abstract
The present paper strives to illuminate how the new related right for publishers, as introduced by the Digital Single Market Directive, will affect the digital publishing world. Is it going to enhance the press market and protect its beneficiaries or will it harm journalism and decrease publishers’ revenues? This thesis is mainly based on researches and studies conducted by research centers, universities and relevant to Copyright stakeholders. Since the EU directive has not yet been applied, our resources are inter alia position papers, announcements and letters prepared from associations representing journalists, publishers etc. to express their opinion and arguments on it. We will also use documents drafted by the European Institutions during the preparatory stage of the directive. On the first part, we will examine the newly introduced by the DSM Directive “related right for publishers” (Article 15) starting from indicating the inefficiency of the current situation and publishers’ rights to protect their own interests. Subsequently, we will focus on the examination of the special characteristics of the right by analyzing each paragraph of the provision; we will explain how a similar right affected publishers in several member states and we will use a case analysis on how the first country implementing the EU Directive transposed it into national law. At the end, we will contrast the opinions expressed to battle the introduction of this right and the answers given to those arguments, which support the latter and after this comparison we will conclude with an evaluation of the nature and usefulness of the right.
en
heal.advisorName
Stamatoudi, Irini
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Komnios, Komninos
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Chrisohoidou, Anna
el
heal.academicPublisher
IHU
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Related Items