GR Semicolon EN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Zambas, Michalis
en
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-12T11:50:53Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-13T00:00:46Z
dc.date.issued
2020-06-12
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/29572
dc.rights
Default License
dc.subject
BRRD
en
dc.subject
Normal insolvency proceedings
en
dc.subject
Bank liquidation
en
dc.subject
Banks resolution
en
dc.subject
Resolution tools
en
dc.subject
Bail in tool
en
dc.subject
To big to fail problem
en
dc.subject
Bank recovery and resolution directive
en
dc.title
The BRRD vs. Normal Insolvency Proceedings. Opposite or interconnected? The scope of the new EU resolution framework.
en
heal.type
masterThesis
en_US
heal.generalDescription
An analysis of the new EU resolution framework under the BRRD in comparison with normal insolvency proceedings and in particular with liquidation procedure, which takes place in a situation of financial distress in cases when an institution's collapse cannot be obviated in any other way. This thesis focused on what are the new steps and rules that European legislators brought in the aftermath of the financial crisis and how much further did they go in comparison with normal insolvency proceedings, and aims to present, whether the new resolution toolkit under the BRRD offers something more whenever a bank turns to be insolvent.
en
heal.classification
Law, legislations, EU regulation
en
heal.language
en
en_US
heal.access
free
en_US
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
en_US
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Banking Law, Arbitration/Mediation
en_US
heal.publicationDate
2020-05-26
heal.abstract
This dissertation was written as part of the Master of laws (LLM) in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Banking Law, Arbitration/Mediation at the International Hellenic University. Having regard the dramatic outcomes of the recent global financial crisis that proves normal insolvency proceedings to be inadequate to handle financial institutions collapse, the present thesis aspires to offer as comprehensive as possible within the limits of dissertation an analysis of the new EU resolution framework in comparison with normal insolvency proceedings and, in particular, with liquidation procedure. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) constitute the core of the research and mainly, its resolution toolkit that applied in a situation of financial distress in cases when the institution’s collapse cannot be obviated in any other way. Accordingly, this thesis focused on what are the new steps and rules that European legislators brought in the aftermath of the financial crisis and how much further did they go in comparison with normal insolvency proceedings. Moreover, aims to present whether the new resolution framework under the BRRD offers something more than the normal insolvency proceedings in relation to its methods and goals, whenever banks turns to be insolvent. In addition, it evaluate if there are any differences between bank resolution under the BRRD and liquidation of banks under normal insolvency proceedings. Resolution and liquidation cases that occurred after the BRRD enforcement are presented by this thesis in order to illustrate the above matters and, to reflect any weaknesses of the new bank resolution directive. To end with, it will present some reviews by several professors and what should have be done to establish a trend that could be followed by each Member State despite the peculiarities that may have to deal with.
en
heal.advisorName
Keijser, Thomas
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Keijser, Thomas
en
heal.academicPublisher
IHU
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Related Items