heal.abstract
The dissertation seeks to address fourth sets of issues: The Armenian issue in the period
1878-1915, The Armenian Genocide narrative, the post-war era, notably the military
trials and the attribution of responsibilities, and the Turkish denialism that began in
modern Turkey of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and continues until today in Erdoğan’s regime.
It also traces the annual commemoration policies by the Armenian diaspora from every
edge of the world in order to build and define the next centennial of the community as a
message of strength, perseverance, and hope for future generations. Finally, it examines
the role of art in commemoration policies and Turkey’s attitude towards the projection
and exposure of the events of the past through art. The paper tries to relate the current
denialism with the Armenian-Turkish debate.
It poses therefore the followed questions how and why do the Armenian and
Turkish debates have different outcomes? What are the implications of these
differences? It looks at how the Armenian diaspora and the Turkish state have used the
unresolved conflict between competing Turkish narratives of denial and Armenian
narratives affirming the genocide's reality to influence political actors in the United
States, Europe, and the Middle East to support their arguments for and against the
genocide's reality. This thesis provides a contribution to knowledge by demonstrating
that genocide recognition is a political issue involving more than the perpetrators and
victims. Recognition of genocide encapsulates other states and communities, just as
genocide involves more than these two players. When this comes to the awareness of
their obligations, bystander governments must consider what they do when genocide is
perpetrated.
Essentially, the dissertation examines genocide from an international perspective,
which is why it mentions the present government's attitude on the problem, as well as
the most recent pronouncement by US President John Baiden, who openly recognized
genocide as a crime against humanity. Therefore, the particular Master's thesis aims at
providing a thorough explanation and understanding of Turkish-Armenian bilateral
relations from the past to today. It focuses on analyzing the importance of the
international recognition of the Armenian Genocide in decision-making steps to
improvement and to justice. It is also a step to humanization, a demand of alleviation
and vindication for all the Armenian diaspora.
el