GR Semicolon EN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Siogka, Panagiota
el
dc.date.accessioned
2022-10-20T11:15:52Z
dc.date.available
2022-10-20T11:15:52Z
dc.date.issued
2022-10-20
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/30099
dc.rights
Default License
dc.subject
Armenian Genocide
el
dc.subject
Memory
el
dc.subject
Armenian diaspora
el
dc.subject
Armenian-Turkish debate
el
dc.subject
Human rights
el
dc.title
The Centennial of the Armenian Genocide: History, Memory and Political Debate
el
heal.type
masterThesis
en_US
heal.contributorName
Siogka, Panagiota
el
heal.contributorID.dhareID
giotasioga24@gmail.com
heal.dateAvailable
2022-09-05
heal.language
en
en_US
heal.access
free
en_US
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
en_US
heal.fileFormat
pdf
en_US
heal.recordProvider
School of Humanities, MA in Black Sea & Eastern Mediterranean Studies
en_US
heal.publicationDate
2022-09-05
heal.abstract
The dissertation seeks to address fourth sets of issues: The Armenian issue in the period 1878-1915, The Armenian Genocide narrative, the post-war era, notably the military trials and the attribution of responsibilities, and the Turkish denialism that began in modern Turkey of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and continues until today in Erdoğan’s regime. It also traces the annual commemoration policies by the Armenian diaspora from every edge of the world in order to build and define the next centennial of the community as a message of strength, perseverance, and hope for future generations. Finally, it examines the role of art in commemoration policies and Turkey’s attitude towards the projection and exposure of the events of the past through art. The paper tries to relate the current denialism with the Armenian-Turkish debate. It poses therefore the followed questions how and why do the Armenian and Turkish debates have different outcomes? What are the implications of these differences? It looks at how the Armenian diaspora and the Turkish state have used the unresolved conflict between competing Turkish narratives of denial and Armenian narratives affirming the genocide's reality to influence political actors in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East to support their arguments for and against the genocide's reality. This thesis provides a contribution to knowledge by demonstrating that genocide recognition is a political issue involving more than the perpetrators and victims. Recognition of genocide encapsulates other states and communities, just as genocide involves more than these two players. When this comes to the awareness of their obligations, bystander governments must consider what they do when genocide is perpetrated. Essentially, the dissertation examines genocide from an international perspective, which is why it mentions the present government's attitude on the problem, as well as the most recent pronouncement by US President John Baiden, who openly recognized genocide as a crime against humanity. Therefore, the particular Master's thesis aims at providing a thorough explanation and understanding of Turkish-Armenian bilateral relations from the past to today. It focuses on analyzing the importance of the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide in decision-making steps to improvement and to justice. It is also a step to humanization, a demand of alleviation and vindication for all the Armenian diaspora.
el
heal.advisorName
Michailidis, Iakovos
el
heal.committeeMemberName
Kordosis, Stefanos
el
heal.academicPublisher
IHU
el
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
en_US
heal.academicPublisherDhareID
https://www.ihu.gr/
en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Related Items