dc.contributor.author
Zempiliadou, Sofia
en
dc.date.accessioned
2015-06-15T10:14:53Z
dc.date.available
2015-09-27T05:57:39Z
dc.date.issued
2015-06-15
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/343
dc.rights
Default License
dc.title
The Adoption of Employee Performance Appraisal Systems and their Effectiveness in Corporate Greece
en
heal.keyword
Personnel management--Case studies
en
heal.keyword
Employee motivation
en
heal.keyword
Dissertations, Academic
en
heal.license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
heal.recordProvider
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, MSc in Management
heal.publicationDate
2011-10
heal.bibliographicCitation
Zempiliadou Sofia ,2011, The Adoption of Employee Performance Appraisal Systems and their Effectiveness in Corporate Greece, Master's Dissertation, International Hellenic University
en
heal.abstract
The aim of this work is to examine the effectiveness of human resource practices
applied in modern organizations focusing on the adoption and the implementation of
employee performance appraisal systems. The study presents two subsidiaries of large
multinational companies with a long history in the market and strong Human Resource
Management. Both companies are located in Thessaloniki and have been rewarded as
Best Work Places in Greece. The results of the study indicate that effective performance
appraisal systems are based on the strategic objectives and goals of each organization.
Moreover, the role of the managers and the establishment of specific standards as well
as the giving and receiving feedback are crucial for achieving employee motivation and
development for the organizations’ benefit to respond to the challenges of today’s
marketplace.
en
heal.tableOfContents
Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4
2. Literature Review on Employee Performance Appraisal Systems............................... 7
2.1. Performance Appraisal and its Role in modern organizations ............................... 7
2.2. Employee Performance Appraisal and its effectiveness in an organization ......... 11
2.3. Critique of Employee Performance Appraisal ...................................................... 13
3. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 14
4. The case of Coca Cola Hellenic ............................................................................... 18
4.1. Company Background .......................................................................................... 18
4.2. Business imperatives and employee performance ............................................ 18
4.3. Employee Performance Appraisal System at Coca Cola Hellenic ....................... 19
4.3.1. The rationale of Coca Cola Hellenic’s System .............................................. 19
4.3.2. Adopting Coca Cola’s Performance Appraisal System ................................ 21
4.3.3. Employee Performance Appraisal at Coca Cola HBC and its effectiveness. 26
5. The Case of Leroy Merlin Hellas ............................................................................... 31
5.1 Company Background ........................................................................................... 31
5.2. Business Imperatives and Employee Performance ............................................... 31
5.3. Employee Performance Appraisal at Leroy Merlin Hellas ................................... 32
5.3.1. The rationale of Leroy Merlin System ............................................................ 32
5.3.2. Adopting Leroy Melrin’s performance appraisal system............................... 33
5.3.3. Employee Performance Appraisal at Leroy Merlin Hellas and its
effectiveness.............................................................................................................. 36
6. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................... 40
References ....................................................................................................................... 43
Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 45
en
heal.advisorName
Mihail, Dimitrios
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Chatzoglou, Prodromos
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Kondylis, Emmanouil
en
heal.committeeMemberName
Mihail, Dimitrios
en
heal.academicPublisher
School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, MSc in Management
en
heal.academicPublisherID
ihu
heal.fullTextAvailability
true